<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Difference Between SATA and SAS</title>
	<atom:link href="http://serversideguy.com/2009/06/04/the-difference-between-sata-and-sas/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://serversideguy.com/2009/06/04/the-difference-between-sata-and-sas/</link>
	<description>Just another Barsness Solutions weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 05:25:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bret</title>
		<link>http://serversideguy.com/2009/06/04/the-difference-between-sata-and-sas/comment-page-1/#comment-118225</link>
		<dc:creator>Bret</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Oct 2011 09:01:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://serversideguy.com/?p=19#comment-118225</guid>
		<description>other than using the wrong symbols for the speed it&#039;s informative.  Should read Gb/s since it&#039;s measured in Gigabits, not Gigabytes...Gb = Gigabits. GB = Gigabytes.  Speeds have not reached (even on a theoretical level) 12 GB/s...but 12 Gb/s is feasible.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>other than using the wrong symbols for the speed it&#8217;s informative.  Should read Gb/s since it&#8217;s measured in Gigabits, not Gigabytes&#8230;Gb = Gigabits. GB = Gigabytes.  Speeds have not reached (even on a theoretical level) 12 GB/s&#8230;but 12 Gb/s is feasible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

